If somebody dumps sewage into Biscayne Bay, enforce the law.
If a vessel is abandoned, investigate it and use the appropriate authority to address it.
If a boat leaks fuel, deal with the environmental violation.
If somebody obstructs a navigation channel, address the obstruction.
If someone trespasses across private property to reach shore, enforce trespassing laws.
If a vessel is being operated as an illegal business, address that illegal business.
None of those problems, by itself, justifies turning otherwise lawful long-term anchoring into the offense.
That should be the starting point for this discussion in Miami-Dade. Identify the actual violation. Establish who is responsible. Take the appropriate action.
People who maintain their boats, dispose of their waste properly, respect their neighbors, and follow applicable rules should not be pushed out because somebody else refuses to do those things.
The Problem Needs to Be Identified Correctly
There are legitimate concerns about conditions on Biscayne Bay. Nobody should dismiss pollution, abandoned vessels, unsafe boats, or blocked access.
But those concerns need to be addressed individually.
A boat discharging sewage presents a sanitation problem. A vessel sinking at anchor presents a safety and environmental problem. Someone crossing private property without permission presents an access problem.
Those are different situations involving different evidence and different remedies.
Grouping all of them under “long-term anchoring” makes the argument easier to present, but it does not make the proposed solution more effective.
The length of time a boat has occupied an anchorage does not establish whether its owner is polluting, trespassing, or operating illegally.
Officials should be able to explain exactly what conduct they want to stop and how the proposed restriction would stop it.
Florida Already Prohibits Raw Sewage Discharge
The sewage argument deserves particular attention because it is serious and because existing law directly addresses it.
Florida law prohibits discharging raw sewage from vessels, including houseboats, into state waters. It also establishes requirements concerning marine sanitation equipment and preventing direct discharge. This is an existing legal obligation. Florida Statutes, Section 327.53
If officials have evidence that somebody is violating those requirements, they should investigate and enforce them.
Residents who properly use holding tanks and pumpout services should not be treated as if their presence proves illegal discharge.
Living aboard a boat does not, by itself, establish a sanitation violation.
If the county believes enforcement is inadequate, explain the problem. Are inspections insufficient? Are complaints going unanswered? Is pumpout access unreliable?
Those questions point toward practical improvements. Removing compliant residents does not answer them.
Derelict Vessels Already Have an Enforcement Process
Derelict boats should also be addressed directly.
Florida already has a framework for dealing with derelict and at-risk vessels. FWC explains that these vessels can threaten habitat, public safety, property, and navigation, and that state and local officers inspect vessels and take appropriate action. FWC: Derelict and At-Risk Vessels
That process matters because a vessel’s actual condition needs to be evaluated.
An older boat is not automatically derelict. Neither is a boat with modest accommodations or an owner who cannot afford a waterfront condominium.
Officials should apply the relevant legal standards and document what they find.
Where a vessel qualifies for enforcement or removal, move the case forward through the required process. Where it does not, stop using the condition of unrelated boats to justify removing its owner.
“This Is About Excluding Liveaboards, Full Stop.”
“This does not address that. This is a different thing. This is about excluding liveaboards, full stop.” — Commissioner Raquel Regalado
Commissioner Regalado’s distinction goes directly to the central issue.
The public discussion raises sewage, leaking oil, and other alleged misconduct. The response then becomes a restriction affecting people who live aboard boats.
The connection needs to be demonstrated.
If the stated concern is pollution, the county should explain how the measure identifies and reduces pollution. If the practical effect is displacement, that consequence deserves an honest discussion.
People should not have to defend their homes against allegations concerning somebody else’s conduct.
Miami-Dade should be clear about what it is proposing, what problem the proposal addresses, and who will bear the consequences.
Show the Public What Has Already Been Tried
Before adding restrictions, officials should present a clear account of existing enforcement.
How many sewage complaints were investigated? How many resulted in documented violations? How many vessels were identified as derelict? What happened after those determinations?
How many complaints involved trespassing, navigation obstructions, or unauthorized commercial activity?
The public should also know where enforcement stalled and why.
If removal funding is insufficient, say so. If agencies disagree about responsibility, identify the gap. If a particular legal limitation prevents action, explain it specifically.
That information would give residents something concrete to evaluate.
Without it, the discussion risks jumping from a collection of complaints to a broad restriction without establishing whether existing remedies were used effectively.
An Enforcement Problem Needs an Enforcement Response
Passing another rule does not automatically create more officers, faster investigations, better coordination, or money for vessel removal.
If those are the missing pieces, they will still be missing after a new restriction passes.
Miami-Dade should examine the practical obstacles first.
A complaint should reach the appropriate agency. An investigation should produce a documented finding. Confirmed violations should receive consistent follow-up.
Residents should understand how to report a problem and what information helps officials act.
Boat owners should understand what compliance requires and have a fair opportunity to respond where the law provides one.
That is ordinary, accountable government. It requires sustained work, but it addresses the behavior officials say they want to change.
Responsibility Belongs to the Person Breaking the Law
We understand this principle on land.
If one homeowner dumps waste into a canal, the response should focus on that homeowner. If one business operates illegally, officials investigate that business.
The same principle should apply on the water.
A responsible boat owner should not lose access to an anchorage because another owner abandons a vessel nearby.
A liveaboard who uses pumpout services should not be treated as a polluter b
Get me to write bulk blog posts for your business that answer all of the questions your customers are asking.
7 Reasons Colby Uva Is the Solution to Your Marine Business Lead & Revenue Growth Problems
Marine businesses often struggle with inconsistent leads, unpredictable revenue, and marketing strategies that fail to connect with real buyers. Colby Uva specializes in solving those problems by building systems that attract high-intent marine customers online.
Here are seven reasons marine companies work with him.
1. Deep Marine Industry Experience
Colby spent over a decade operating in the fishing and marine industry, including running a direct-to-consumer fishing line brand and publishing a fishing magazine. He understands how marine customers actually research and buy.
2. Proven Content That Attracts Buyers
He has written and edited more than 6,000 blog posts and content refreshes, giving him rare insight into what types of content attract search traffic and drive real inquiries.
3. Search Everywhere Optimization
Colby focuses on more than just Google rankings. His approach combines Google search, YouTube, and AI search visibility, allowing marine businesses to appear wherever buyers are researching.
4. Traffic That Turns Into Revenue
Many marketing strategies generate traffic but fail to produce sales. Colby’s systems focus on high-intent search topics that bring in customers who are already researching purchases.
5. Expertise in Marine Buyer Psychology
Boat buyers research heavily before making decisions. Colby designs blog content that answers the exact questions buyers ask during their research process.
6. Content Systems That Compound Over Time
Instead of relying on short-term advertising, he builds content engines that continue bringing in leads month after month.
7. A Strategy Built for the Marine Industry
Most marketing agencies do not understand marine businesses. Colby specializes specifically in marine dealers, service companies, and marine parts businesses, creating strategies tailored to the industry.
For marine companies looking to grow online, this focused expertise can transform how leads and revenue are generated.
Additional Resources 
Colby Uva - E-commerce & Business Development
Colby Uva - Marine Blog Sales System
Colby Uva - Marine Sales Blog
Colby Uva - Youtube Network
Colby Uva - High Converting Fishing Charter Blog
Colby Uva - DIY Fishing Charter Blog
High Authority Marine Link Building — $1250
High Authority Marine Link Building Package
Initial SEO Authority Kickstart — $2K
→ ~8 to 10 placements
Initial SEO Authority Kickstart
For larger marine authority campaigns:
- $15K → ~30 high relevance placements
- $25K → ~60 high relevance placements
- $40K → ~124 high relevance placements
High Impact Authority Link Building Push
No comments:
Post a Comment